1. Buy a V8 gasoline car. This is not for you.

  2. I’m not sure why you even considered it. Im with you on the annual service fee, but the other reasons I find you contradict yourself. Not enough safe technology? I suppose you want a car to drive itself? How is that fun? Battery replacement is subjective, it all depends on how much you drive. Delivery window? Sure, that will really change my mind from buying one. Software bugs? Every new car has bugs, some never get fixed. I’m not sure why you even bothered.

    1. Author

      Hi Brian,

      For the Safety Technology, if you’re driving a car properly, it will never engage and you’ll never know it’s there. I’m very passionate about safety and have significant involvement/exposure through work. Accidents happen when several small issues happen at the same time, allowing a much bigger accident to occur. Glancing down at the car radio generally isn’t a big deal. Glancing down as someone pulls into your blind spot also isn’t usually a concern, because you wouldn’t be glancing at the radio when changing lanes. But when these two things happen just as the driver in front unexpectedly brakes, there is an accident. This doesn’t happen very often, but when it does, technology can prevent accidents and save lives. But if it annoying intervenes when there is no need to do so, I agree with you, it become more of a distraction than a benefit.

      The software bugs Tesla has experienced are of a much greater magnitude than any other production vehicle I’ve known, except maybe the now defunct Fisker Karma. I can’t think of any other vehicle that has to be rebooted when driving because all of the instrumentation stopped working. Or one that caused the battery to completely drain overnight for no apparent reason after a software update. Or caused the brakes to lock when moving in reverse because the driver seat occupancy sensor was too sensitive. These types of issues should never make it into production. These are more than minor annoyances and I’d rather not deal with them.

      1. Carlton someone above pointed out not only is your diatribe full of contradictions but as an engineer I’m wondering what type of engineering degree you might of acquired?
        I could not stop laughing at the irony dripping from each point of dissatisfaction.
        Based upon reading your entire body of work I really do not understand why you’re even considering purchasing this vehicle.

        1. Safety…..according to you, if you buy and keep your cars every 10 to 14 years..then what kind of safety components do you currently have in you car, compared to those available even five years ago? Does your 14 year old car have crumple zone, air bags,etc, lane change warning, blind spot technology? C’mon be honest with yourself. The list is endless in this rapidly changing technological environment.
        2. Awd. Maybe in a car for winter but with the amount of torque, awd would seem to be unecessary/overkill.
        3. To my knowledge ALL VEHICLES need to be maintained to the dealers predetermined maintenance schedule in order to validate the new car warranty!! Now you might be able to take it somewhere else for maintenance but why would you want to do that, except for price, which I would agree might be cheaper elsewhere. But 600 bucks a. Year for a hundred thousand dollar car??? Pretty cheap.

        4. Delivery and pricing issues….. If you keep your car 10 to 14 years it doesn’t seem like delivery of your car one month earlier or later would mean much. As far as pricing goes if you buy from Tesla you have a fixed price. GO try that at any other dealership FOR ANY OTHER CAR.
        5.not fun to drive????? Zero to sixty in four secs…great handling, an air suspension option…I can only imagine how fun your 14-year-old car is to drive, especially with all the updated technology it must have.!! 🙂 and safety features.
        5. Battery issues?. How long is the average warranty on most current new cars…..not 10 years on the engine or transmission save two brands.

        Lastly but most importantly, based upon the content of your article I wonder if you would have ever bought a car back in the early 1900’s, when they first came out.
        About as fast as a bike. No safety features. All kinds of mechanical issues. No radio. No disc brakes. No seatbelts.
        No headrests. No Windshield wipers. No Antitheft devices.
        No automatic transmission. No color choices. And probably less than stellar guarantee,

        As an engineer why would you want to drive a car that is vastly outdated instead of driving a car that’s constantly updating itself to the newest technology available.

        I shudder to think how anything would’ve got invented if there were more folks like you, when there’s such a compelling lack of interest in the newest technology available.

        As someone above also said…this car’s not for you!

        1. Author

          Rick, you are certainly free to disagree with my opinions, but I find your personal insults against me to be a bit petty and unwarranted. Nevertheless, here are my responses to your points.

          1. When I purchase a car that I intend to keep for a long time, I purchase one with the most advanced safety features available at that time. Of course new safety features will be introduced in the future, but the idea is to not start at a deficit. If safety features were the singular most important aspect of vehicle ownership, then it would make sense to upgrade every few years. But for me, there are a variety of competing considerations, one of which is fully maximizing the investment in the vehicle by extending its life for a very long time.

          2. After the winter we’ve had this year in Indiana, I think AWD is more important than ever. And even as far south as Atlanta, where the city was completely shut down by only a couple of inches of snow, I think the benefits of AWD are apparent. But I agree with you that AWD is unnecessary in most conditions. My biggest complaint against AWD is the fuel efficiency penalty from the additional weight and drivetrain losses. Most other safety technologies have very little negative impact on fuel economy, but the impact of AWD is measurable, even on hybrid and electric cars. From an efficiency standpoint, snow tires provide a substantial traction benefit and little efficiency penalty, and that’s what I use on my RWD Infiniti G35 in the winter.

          3. You are correct that all cars need to be maintained to the OEM’s maintenance schedule. The big difference is that they do not required to be maintained by the OEM. The other major difference is that all other OEMs publish a list of maintenance requirements and detail exactly what is being done at each maintenance interval. Tesla does not provide any of this information. They simply specify that you must pay them $600 and take the car to them, for some undefined inspections. Personally, I try to never pay for something if I have no idea what I’m paying for and what benefit it provides. $600 over 4 years equates to $2400. For reference, that is about how much I’ve spent on maintenance and repairs for all 3 of my vehicles since 1998. This includes oil and filter changes, air filters, brake pads/rotors/fluids, windshield wipers, bulbs, 1 water pump, 2 thermostats, an accessory drive belt, an ignition switch, 2 sets of spark plugs, and 2 oxygen sensors. (It does not include tires.) I achieved this low cost by performing all of the inspections and the labor myself, so you could argue that if the value of personal time is included, the cost is higher, but I enjoy doing this type of work. So for me, $2400 over 4 years for 1 vehicle is substantially more expensive than $2400 over 16 years for 3 vehicles. During these 16 years, I’ve paid exactly $0 to any dealer.

          4. Over a long time horizon, delivery timing isn’t a huge factor. But as you stated, Teslas are expensive cars, and when someone receives call that their vehicle will be delivered in 1 week rather than 7 months in the future as originally forecasted, it can create financial planning stress. As far as the non-negotiable price, I see that as a negative. Tesla is forcing every customer to pay MSRP. It’s very rare that any other brand changes above MSRP, especially for vehicles that are custom ordered, as all Teslas are. For my car purchases, I’ve negotiated prices substantially lower than MSRP, and have done so using publicly available dealer invoice pricing information. The fact that Tesla does not do this is not a win for consumers, expect for perhaps those who do not do well at negotiating and feel comfort in knowing that someone else didn’t pay less than they for the same vehicle.

          5. The Tesla is not as fun to drive as my (almost) 16 year old Porsche Boxster. While the Tesla does have faster 0-60 times, it performs substantially worse around curves. The low polar moment of inertia benefit of a mid-engine configuration is substantial when it comes to turn-in and carrying speed through corners. The feel from hydraulically-assisted steering in the Boxter is immensely superior to the electric-assit in the Tesla, and the manual transmission is much more engaging. I can also say the same for my Infiniti G35 6MT. But for people who define fun-to-drive as being constrained to a straight line and depressing the left foot, the Tesla is superior. As for the safety feature gap, they are surprisingly minimal. The Boxster lacks vehicle stability control, which was added 2 years after I purchased my car, but that alone was worth the cost to upgrade. From a safety technology standpoint, the Tesla doesn’t have anything that my daily driver 2004 Infiniti doesn’t include.

          6. There is a big difference between battery/engine warranty and battery/engine life. I know of no car manufacturer where engine replacements frequently occur after only 10 years or 120,000 miles. With the battery pack in a Tesla, it is very possible that this would be required on most vehicles.

          I think comparing modern safety expectations to those at the beginning of the industrial revolution is short-sighted. The industrial injury and fatality rates were several orders of magnitude higher then, and the value placed on human life substantially lower. I think it’s fantastic that safety has become so much more important over the past century. Just because a company innovates in one area (high energy density electric drivetrains), does not excuse lack of innovation in other areas (vehicle safety features.) I recently read an article where the driver of a Tesla blamed the “new car smell” for causing him to fall asleep at the wheel, cross the center line, and kill a cyclist. Now in my opinion, the “new car smell” is nothing but an excuse for a driver who is solely to blame for falling asleep at the wheel. But it is also my opinion that the cyclist would likely be alive today if the Tesla were equipped with a lane departure notification and avoidance system.

          As for your assertion that nothing would be invented if there were “more folks like me”, I’ll let my public record of 2 patents speak for itself, not to mention other non-publically disclosed contributions I’ve made to my employer. And as for electric cars specifically, they are not all that new or innovative, as the first practical electric car was invented in 1859. The biggest difference with modern electric cars is battery energy density, but even that innovation did not originate within Tesla or the auto industry. Where Tesla excels is packaging these high energy density batteries in a vehicle design that offers a usable driving range in many practical usage situations. But this accomplishment is not without drawbacks that simply are not present in competing automobile configurations. This will change over time. However, I don’t think we will see mainstream adoption of purely electric vehicles, or even plug-in hybrid electric vehicles for that matter, because other alternatives will continue to be less expensive. The fact is that most consumers care more about their costs than they do about their singular impact on the environment. And although electric vehicles do not directly produce emissions themselves, they do indirectly produce remote emissions at the power plant that creates the electricity. Although these emissions are typically less than comparable internal combustion engines, it is a misnomer to call electric vehicles zero emissions vehicles. Remote emissions vehicles would be more appropriate.

          You don’t need to reference a previous commenter to figure out that this car is not for me. That’s the whole point of the original article, and the reason I felt compelled to write it is that I felt like Tesla was being hugely misleading with their marketing promises and warranty practices. I placed a substantial down payment on what I thought would be my next vehicle, only to find out that it didn’t meet all of the expectations that Tesla had created. To Tesla’s credit, and to the benefit of consumers, Tesla has since corrected many of these issues. In a few years, I think they could very well make a vehicle that I would purchase. But they aren’t there today.

          1. No personal insult intended, but what a my case.
            I live in Atlanta and have for over 15 years. Do you know where my preowned P85 will be in an ice storm. Safe in our garage. BTW they no longer require annual inspections and yes it is retroactive. They now offer AWD and all the high tech features you insist upon. I had a 2003 G35 coupe but my P85 would leave it behind carrying 5 adults. Tesla is definitely not for you.
            You don’t deserve one – period

          2. Author

            Steve/Ernesto/Rick, yes, Tesla now no longer requires the annual inspection to maintain warranty, offers all wheel drive as standard equipment, and offers all of the safety features that I pointed out were missing…I mention all of those items in the numerous updates I made to my original post.

            I’m glad that I identified the deficiencies that were important to me and decided not to purchase at the time, rather than being one of the outraged owners complaining about it after the fact. Tesla found these to be important items as well, which is why they were addressed in subsequent model updates.

            I’m unsure why I do not deserve a Tesla. I pointed out deficiencies that I felt were substantial enough to warrant cancellation of my order. Unfortunately, some Tesla owners want to misinterpret this into me attacking them over their decision to place their own order. Each person is entitled to their own opinion regarding what does or does not fit their own personal situations. That does not invalidate the decisions that others make for their own personal situations.

          3. Oh and in that Atlanta ice storm what will I be driving – our excellent 2008 Honda 4wd Ridgeline as I have several ice/snow storms before. To each his own.

  3. All Tesla buyers are people willing to stay on the cutting edge in order to be eco friendly. All your points shows you do not have the willingness. Also, point 5, basically discards electic cars at a whole. I’m looking forward an electric perhaps in 5 or 10 years i can buy an basically forget about engine maintenance and gas stations!

    I hope one day once you have some more dispensable income (and the model X is launched) you reconsider buying a Testla, i’d love to read about it here as i do when look for TV info.

  4. Drove the P85+ car, explored the financing options and resale value along with cash out of pocket requirements (I would not be writing a check for $100-120K, alas). It is a fun car for sure, but the purchase numbers just do not make any sense unless you just want to drive a Model S at any cost, logic be dam*ed. Comparing this to the financial side a conventional luxury or performance car purchase (with maker’s subsidizing, guaranteed residuals and such) – Tesla just can’t put this together for the buyer at this time – you’ll still write a $25K check even with their co-branded finance program to guarantee the 3 year residual. Add to that a known $12K-ish battery 10-ish years down the road makes it look even worse. Maybe not for you, but for me.

  5. Author

    The current value proposition for Tesla is basically that an owner pays an extra $10k-$20k for some innovative features and a more environmentally focused design. If these aspects are extremely important to someone, this can be a good investment. If they are of lesser importance, then there are a lot of other vehicles that offer a better value proposition.

    For me, it really came down the the design of the vehicle not meeting all of my current usage scenarios. The compromises weren’t with the advantages and the cost.

    I’m very interested in the BMW i8 gasoline/electric hybrid. It’s smaller, sportier, and has a backup gasoline engine. This means I could drive it to visit my friends and family who live hundreds of miles away in an area where charging is an impossibility. But the cost of the i8 is expected to be even higher than the Tesla, so that’s likely to be a show-stopper for me.

  6. A good car to buy. The range is amazing and we are waiting for the low-cost model also…

  7. You can’t expect a car with groundbreaking technology to be perfect from the beginning. If everybody would demand perfection from new technology it would never succeed.

  8. Carlton. After Elon Musk unveiled the Tesla Model D a couple of weeks ago, all of your points are now pretty much moot…but enjoy what ever you decided to purchase, and drive.

    1. Author

      Edward, you are absolutely correct. Tesla actually listens! I still haven’t purchased a new car and the Tesla Model S 85D is now on my short list. My biggest reservation now is the price. . . it’s a lot to spend on a car (of any make.)

  9. Carlton, I am with you on all points. I am glad you did more testing than I did, and made a better informed decision. I bought P85D, and now can’t stand regenerative braking being triggered by releasing accelerator pedal. I sent multiple requests to Tesla, as well as I found that many people like you and I requested that there will be an option to engage regeneration from brake pedal only. To no avail. I even offered to work for free and implement this feature for Tesla, which was ignored. Also, either there are too many Tesla zealots that responded to you and other people complains about Tesla, as I found every time someone doesn’t like a smallest thing about a Tesla car, or they are paid Tesla shills or PR staff. In either case if I don’t get resolution soon, I will sell my P85D. By the way, not easy to sell your Tesla car either. Tesla does not use dealers, but they don’t act as a dealer either. They don’t buy and resell their used cars, at most you can trade in an old model for a new model, for significant loss. I thought Tesla not having dealer channel is cost saving for a customer; no, it just serves them to push cars out, and when you bought a car you are on your own. Again, smart move on your part to do your research. Now, I expect the shills to pile up on me: 3-2-1 go?

    1. Author

      Peter, I’m very sorry to hear of your troubles with your P85D. It’s frustrating that the regenerative braking isn’t more configurable, as it is in other vehicles (including my wife’s 2007 Lexus 400h.) Tesla seems to be more focused on creating a definitive electric vehicle experience vs. creating an compromised driver-focused experience. Most Tesla fans seem to feel the compromises are part of the allure, and that any personal sacrifice is more than offset by other attributes. I’m somewhat envious of them, because I’m pretty finicky and less satisfied by compromise.

      I’m also a bit surprised how overwhelmingly one-sided Tesla supporters seem to be. No company or product is perfect, and it’s OK to be disappointed with some aspects. But voicing these opinions about a Tesla seems to generate very passionate responses. Pretty much every Tesla post on Autoblog.com demonstrates this if there is the slightest criticism.

      Given all of the improvements Tesla made to the Model S since I canceled by order, I almost put my deposit down again on a (non-P) 85D. But after lots of test driving, I ultimately decided on an Audi S7. It’s actually similar in a lot of ways to the Model S, but the 2 main differences that drove me to the Audi were: 1) it had a more satisfying driver-focused experience that isn’t easily described and 2) it was substantially cheaper because I purchased it used (from a dealer)…and I was unable to do so with a Model S. An added bonus is the Ross-Tech VCDS software, which gives an even greater level of configuration for anyone willing to recode the default programming. It’s disappointing there isn’t similar software available for Teslas and the regenerative braking setting…

  10. Carlton, I may end up doing something similar, unfortunately after reselling my car privately. How regenerative braking is implemented is the only serious issue I have with Tesla cars. Particularly that as an engineer I can tell you that I could implement this feature given access to their software. That is, 1) making another option – coast or go into neutral mode when accelerator pedal is released, and 2) use currently used in Tesla cars Bosch iBooster brake module to pass regenerative braking commands to car control system from the brake pedal, pretty much what accelerator pedal does now. The first one is trivial, second one is a bit more involved, but technically not challenging at all.

    I was trying to communicate with Tesla pretty persistently over the last couple of months, always ending with being passed to Tesla support, who invariably would respond, that feature like this in not in the plans, but they can write down my request.

    I’ve done a good amount of searching on forums, and I find that there were many people like you and I, asking for this functionality, starting at Roadster times and on. I have no proof, but it seems to me that someone high up in Tesla figured they invented a better way of driving. They called this one pedal driving. And whoever it is, he or she is adamant on keeping it this way. I don’t see it in any way necessary or making the car more efficient.

    I live in pretty cold climate, at least in winter, and occasionally, if I park outside, in the morning car is cold, and regenerative braking turns itself off because battery is cold (not very cold, just a minus few degrees C but it all it takes). Then I find what a pleasure it is to drive P85D, for 20 minutes until regenerative braking gradually starts to kick in. Looking back on my two desired features, I would like 1) and 2), but I would settle on compromise of having just 1). As I found, regenerative braking, even in mixed City/Highway driving extends my range by about 15%. That is all; my car typically consumes about 430 watt hour per mile while most conscientiously using regeneration, or about 490 watt per hour when regeneration is off – until the battery warms up. From environment perspective and from cost perspective this is negligible.

    Sorry for the long story. I believe you made a smart choice Carlton, I wish I insisted on taking the car for 2-3 hours test ride on couple occasions, and hopefully in hindsight I would make a decision like you made. I just could not imagine the driving experience would be like this, given so many positive reviews. If some day Tesla will change their ways, you probably will consider them for your next car. But again, by then most likely there will be a number of other high end electric cars to choose from. Again, Tesla zealots, I am not going to start another discussion with you, these are my comments for Carlton.

    1. Author

      Peter, I think you’re spot on with the one footed driving comment…this is how Tesla thinks all cars should function. Unfortunately, as implemented, regenerative braking is fairly abrupt. It’s like an unexpected push in the back of the head every time there is foot pedal lift-off. I call this “head bob.”

      Cars with manual transmissions produce engine compression braking when lifting off the throttle (without depressing the clutch.) The big difference with that deceleration is that it comes on more gradually, and has lower overall magnitude, so it’s not a distraction. It’s an analog transition vs. a digital transition. In addition to your 2 proposals, I think a third option for Tesla would be to gradually phase in the regenerative braking force over 5-7 seconds, so there’s not a sudden/abrupt change in vehicle speed. The result would be a tiny/gentle head bob forward after throttle lift-off vs. a more neck-snapping head bob. And Tesla gets to keep on being a “1 foot driving” company.

      In a somewhat related topic, I made a switch to a different type of transmission in my Audi S7 for similar reasons. I’ve driven cars with conventional manual transmissions for the past 20 years. My one complaint was that, no matter how quickly I shifted and how precisely I tried to match engine revs, there was always some amount of head bob. This was due to the pause in power delivery while the clutch was depressed and a similar head bob when the clutch was re-engaged (if the engine wasn’t at the perfect RPM for the selected gear and current road speed.) For this reason, I decided to give up on the conventional manual transmission, and instead opt for a computer-controlled dual clutch automated manual transmission (aka Audi S-tronic, Volkswagen DSG, Porsche PDK, Honda DCT.) The gear changes are instantaneous. The engine speed matching is perfect every time. And the end result is…no head bob during gear changes.

      Teslas obviously don’t have this gear change “head bob” problem during acceleration, due to no multi-speed transmission. So it’s extremely unfortunate that the head bob distraction is there during regenerative braking…and all it would take is a software change to eliminate it. Competition is coming on all fronts, from companies who are known for addressing these kinds of issues. Hopefully Tesla will respond.

      1. Carlton, it looks like we come from a similar driving experience, and both picky and enjoy real good driving. I also was driving mostly manual transmission cars – BMW i328 convertible in 1990th till 2003, and since Subaru WRX STI where I aftermarket upgraded turbo, clutch, E85, etc. bringing it to 460 HP on wheels and under 4 sec to 60 MPH. Subaru STI handling is superior to many ‘sports’ cars, and of course Model S. But I would have no issues driving P85D, handling is still very good. It is laughable when on Tesla forums people try to explain how Model S handling is like manual transmission sports car in second or third gear; you explained it exactly. And then they say how ICE style driving should be the thing of the past; o really, they don’t see their own contradiction?

        I also would like an automated dual clutch manual transmission though.

        I wanted to use an electric car for years, or more like decades. From technical perspective though I believed that an electric motor per wheel would be ideal. I believe that AWD is the way for cars to be designed. To get rid of transmissions, differentials, and ideal electronic control circuits. When Tesla announced P85D, I figured it is close enough with two engines. Even though it is not an engine per wheel, it looks like it will be decades when that future design will be implemented by car manufacturers. So I guess I was too taken by marketing and positive spin to really test drive the car, and took sales person word that after short while I will get used to and even like the way car handles regeneration. Now I believe that on top of it being unpleasant to drive this way, it is an accident hazard – having people on the road who are reluctant to use their brakes. I notice it about myself, when I get in mode of using accelerator pedal regeneration, it becomes less automatic to hit the brake pedal. I also read in forums where people laugh that when they switch to a normal car once in a while, they forget how to use brake pedal; and this is not a laughing matter, in my opinion they are dangerous on the road.

        I was trying to convey same as you say to Tesla, that when real car manufacturers catch up and release high performance electric cars, and provide same better scheme of regenerative braking most of them have on plug in and hybrids, Tesla will be in trouble. Upsetting customers and potential future customers by insisting that Tesla knows the best, and will not do something that is tested for decades, because they just invented a new way of driving is going to become a liability. Our example shows it already is a liability. For now Tesla can’t manufacture enough cars to fulfill the demand, but it doesn’t mean Tesla can loose customers, because of some notion that in addition to building an electric car Tesla invented a new way how people are supposed to drive, and how Tesla will force them to do so, whether they want it or not. Which is really a pity, because the car is very good in most other respects. Again, I am not going to respond to Tesla zealots, save your script for someone else.

  11. hey i need some serous help with the little info i have. I have a Tesla with a salvaged title. what was wrong? I don’t know. What was fixed? I don’t know. What I do know is that to get it “activated”, I need to go through a authorized Tesla body shop to get the car inspected then checked off by Tesla then reviewed and the car will be unblocked and will become drivable. What I need to know is is this their way of having an “emissions test”? And can it be passed and or avoided so i can use this car. Please get back to me asap.

    1. Author

      It’s a zero emissions vehicle, so no testing required. You should probably post on the Tesla forums for more details on where to take it for chassis inspection.

      1. The car is functioning. Tesla has an override in the operating system to not allow the car to start. To make that happen, they charge $600 for an inspection and require a “ok” vitrifaction from a Tesla authorized body co. to release the car to the owner and then it starts and is drivable.

        1. Author

          I’m glad you got it figured out. I’m not sure that $600 is a reasonable charge, but at least they have a process and have a way to get a sign-off and reactivation. I’d never heard of a car maker disabling the vehicle once it goes to a salvage title. Please respond back after you get it complete and let us know how the process goes.

  12. Perhaps a Leaf might be more to your liking. Meanwhile Consumer Reports rated it (Tesla S)”the best car they have tested”

    1. Author

      Steve/Ernesto/Rick, the initial review by Consumer Reports was indeed glowing, and owner feedback is extremely positive as well. However, Consumer Reports rated longterm reliability as only “average” based on their long-term test and owner reliability feedback. Edmunds listed 28 separate issues during their 17 month long-term test of a 2013 Model S. I’m glad I didn’t purchase one of the early models; I’m sure reliability has improved since then.

      Edmunds summary:

      Pros: Thrilling performance, spacious and comfortable cabin, unmatched electric range, easy-to-use driver interface, plenty of cargo space, free national supercharger network, no routine maintenance costs, strong resale value.

      Cons: Extensive list of repairs necessary, interior amenities don’t match other luxury sedans in its price range, latest active safety systems not available, needs at least a Level 2 charger to make it useful as a daily driver.

      Bottom Line: The Model S is a fast, comfortable and technologically brilliant luxury sedan, but numerous problems with its touchscreen, tires and drivetrain make it hard to recommend.

  13. It’s been a year since the last comment, and now the Model X is the latest in the spotlight, as is the Autopilot. Two recent significant automobile accidents are in the news, which has pushed away the droning reviews of the problematic FWDs and the seats issues.

    Curious if Mr. Bale ever did acquire a Tesla, and his perspective on the Model X, even the upcoming Model 3….

    I get my Model X next week….despite many issues I had to reconcile with, as it trult is a vehicle without equal in the U.S. Market.

    1. Author

      Hi Eric. I’ve closely watched all of the progress with Model S and have been very impressed with how Tesla has reacted to customer feedback. They addressed all of my misgivings by doing away with the vague battery warranty and mandatory annual inspections, as well as by adding features such as all wheel drive, Autopilot, and more comfortable seats. The only problem with all of those options was… that it made the car pretty darn expensive. I looked for a used Model S with those options, but there were none to be found at the time because the features were so new.

      I ultimately purchased a 3-year-old Audi S7, which is similar in a lot of ways to the Model S (hatchback, all wheel drive, front collision mitigation, active lane correction, etc.) It not electric, but it was substantially less expensive than a new Model S, and that ultimately influenced my decision.

      I think the Model X is pretty awesome. As an automotive enthusiast, I love the falcon wing doors. As an investor, I’d complain that the complicated door design drove up the price, delayed the Model X launch, and ultimately delayed the Model 3. But it looks like Tesla has enough cash reserves to get past that.

      I’m really looking forward to seeing the Model 3 fully revealed in the very near future. That will be the most revolutionary car Tesla makes. And it addresses my one remaining sticking point…the price. I didn’t place an order for the Model 3 because I don’t have plans to purchase a new vehicle in the next few years, but it will definitely be on my list when I do.

      I think all of the negative press around the autopilot fatality is idiotic. It’s terrible that a man lost his life, and there is no way to know for sure what was going on inside the car at the time of the collision. The driver is ultimately responsible for control of a Level 2 autonomous vehicle and should be actively engaged in its operation. For whatever reason, that didn’t happen, and a man lost his life. Someday vehicles will be able to detect and avoid accidents as well as an actively-engaged human operator, but no one has ever said was supposed to be today, with a Tesla or any other commercially-available vehicle. From what I’ve seen, Tesla Autopilot works as well or better than systems from equivalent manufacturers. My Audi does frequent checks to make sure my hands are still on the wheel and from what I understand, Tesla does the same.

      1. I agree with the excessive cost of both S and X models. Definitely the most expensive vehicle I will ever own. What’s interesting is I still I had to make some significant concessions for this purchase.

        Being a larger less flexible person, I am resolved to a future in SUV-sized vehicles for entry and egress, so the Model S was not a good fit, and the X was the “Perfect” vehicle for me.

        The 2 biggest issues for me include the lack of folding 2nd row seat and the amount of road and wind noise present.

        Seats – the first demo by Elon included a brag by him “look at all this cargo space”, which was then sacrificed to utilize the “stylish contoured” seats. I was “car sick” when it became apparent that this was not a reversible change…I almost walked away just on that. EVERY SUV IN THE WORLD HAS FOLDING 2ND ROW SEATS!!!!…so I had to accept this was no SUV. My issue was not hauling TVs home from Costco every week, but rather I have 3 Aussiedoodles that love to join me on errands, and the folded seats are perfect for them to be safely laying down behind my during travel.

        Noise – When they finally brought demo vehicles on a tour, my first 5 minutes was miserable when I noticed huge tire noise coming from under the car, just on city streets, then the highway was much worse, with the decibels increasing exponentially, added by wind noise from the windshield and windows. I was devastated, and only after calling the company to beg for my deposit back was I informed they were Founder’s Models, and the seals for the doors and windows were not up to specs…Yet these were the demo vehicles specifically for those with reservations that have not yet submitted their order…Go Figure!!!

        Only after a Service Center manager gave me a ride in a later build private vehicle did I notice the significant improvement…however being spoiled by Lexus and Porsche over the last 15 years, even my Model X measures 8-10 more decibels under similar driving conditions.

        After vacillating over the option to buy or cancel, I eventually convinced myself that these two issues were not enough of a reason to pass on this otherwise amazing vehicle.

        Yes, the media and press take every opportunity to bash Elon and Tesla. Despite my confidence in the company, I sold all of my shares as I eventually felt the company reputation is increasingly fragile, and so may be the stock prices despite the prospect of the Model 3.

        I really hope the Feds will not come up with a reason, as a result of the current investigations, to shut down the Autopilot feature. Even more so if new hardware is required to advance the autonomous driving feature, I hope that can be retrofitted in current vehicles.

        I too am a fan of Audi, and the older Q7 was something I fancied for years, until I got into a Cayenne Diesel, which is one amazing SUV. But the whole ” VW diesel gate” killed my resale value, and the only other SUV that I considered was the new Q7 which I wanted either in diesel or the e-tron, but no diesels to be sold in this country for who know how long and the e-tron is sometime next year, pricing at about $90K loaded.

        Just now getting acquainted with my X, but so far it has transformed my driving experience, probably due to the focus of the new “toys” included.


        1. Author

          Thanks Eric for sharing your experiences. Lot’s of interesting details that I hadn’t read about elsewhere. Enjoy your new Tesla!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *