<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visual Acuity Viewing Distance: Test It for Yourself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carltonbale.com/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carltonbale.com/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/</link>
	<description>A personal take on tech and home theater</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:28:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhi</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-1698</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/2006/12/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/#comment-1698</guid>
		<description>Can hardly make out. I can see it pixelate when very close but not sure when the transition happens. Any ideas / thoughts from your prior experience with such a Monitor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can hardly make out. I can see it pixelate when very close but not sure when the transition happens. Any ideas / thoughts from your prior experience with such a Monitor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Bale</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Bale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/2006/12/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>I had one of those monitors.  The dot pitch is very small on them and it&#039;s difficult to see the pattern.  But if you compare it to solid grey, you will notice a slight difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had one of those monitors.  The dot pitch is very small on them and it&#8217;s difficult to see the pattern.  But if you compare it to solid grey, you will notice a slight difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhi</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-1696</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/2006/12/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/#comment-1696</guid>
		<description>I have a 30&quot; LCD 2560 x 1600. How do I get this to work? 

I cant really tell if this at all has a pattern?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 30&#8243; LCD 2560 x 1600. How do I get this to work? </p>
<p>I cant really tell if this at all has a pattern?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan schwartz</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>stan schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/2006/12/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>I regret being so late with my reply.

The area being used for the test pattern is composed of alternating light and dark pixels. Each pixel has an opposite one in tone above, below, and to each side. Similarly, each pixel has a like one in tone adjacent to each of the four corners.

Edge pixels are not surrounded by neutralizing pixels.

For the edge pixels to appear as a straight, alias-free line would be the &quot;merging point&quot; of the black &amp; white pixels multiplied by the Rayleigh-limit factor (1.22). So, if the test pattern appears grey at some distance, the jaggies begin to disappear at 1.22 times that.

&quot;I might be wrong; but, I&#039;m never in doubt&quot;.
       - H Marshall McLuhan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I regret being so late with my reply.</p>
<p>The area being used for the test pattern is composed of alternating light and dark pixels. Each pixel has an opposite one in tone above, below, and to each side. Similarly, each pixel has a like one in tone adjacent to each of the four corners.</p>
<p>Edge pixels are not surrounded by neutralizing pixels.</p>
<p>For the edge pixels to appear as a straight, alias-free line would be the &#8220;merging point&#8221; of the black &amp; white pixels multiplied by the Rayleigh-limit factor (1.22). So, if the test pattern appears grey at some distance, the jaggies begin to disappear at 1.22 times that.</p>
<p>&#8220;I might be wrong; but, I&#8217;m never in doubt&#8221;.<br />
       &#8211; H Marshall McLuhan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Bale</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Bale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/2006/12/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is. What&#039;s your point? There&#039;s nothing time sensitive about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is. What&#8217;s your point? There&#8217;s nothing time sensitive about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martini</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-1693</link>
		<dc:creator>Martini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/2006/12/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/#comment-1693</guid>
		<description>I also have a good point to make: this post is 3 years old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have a good point to make: this post is 3 years old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny W</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/2006/12/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Have you noticed that although the main area of this pattern blurs and goes grey as you increase your distance you can still perceive the edge as jaggy?

This is a very good point made by Badvok. Do you have a response?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Have you noticed that although the main area of this pattern blurs and goes grey as you increase your distance you can still perceive the edge as jaggy?</p>
<p>This is a very good point made by Badvok. Do you have a response?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew J. Leer</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew J. Leer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/2006/12/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>What does Visual Acuity Viewing Distance of a monitor mean exactly?  I&#039;d be interested to find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does Visual Acuity Viewing Distance of a monitor mean exactly?  I&#8217;d be interested to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vance</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Vance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/2006/12/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>19&quot;
1280x960

I got as far away as I could in my office, about 20 feet and it was still a checkerboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>19&#8243;<br />
1280&#215;960</p>
<p>I got as far away as I could in my office, about 20 feet and it was still a checkerboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bell</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-1689</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/2006/12/visual-acuity-viewing-distance-test-it-for-yourself/#comment-1689</guid>
		<description>I have a viewsonic VK2035WM ( 20&#039;)LCD
1680 X 1050
With my glasses on 3 foot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a viewsonic VK2035WM ( 20&#8242;)LCD<br />
1680 X 1050<br />
With my glasses on 3 foot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

