<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Facts about HD Video Compression Codecs used in Blu-ray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carltonbale.com/some-facts-about-hd-video-compression-codecs-used-in-blu-ray/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carltonbale.com/some-facts-about-hd-video-compression-codecs-used-in-blu-ray</link>
	<description>My personal take on tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/some-facts-about-hd-video-compression-codecs-used-in-blu-ray/comment-page-1#comment-10277</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 20:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/?p=647#comment-10277</guid>
		<description>I did some testing in the past comparing MPEG-4 ASP and X264. Don&#039;t know how far x264 can be compared to h264 JVC, but MPEG-2 still isn&#039;t all that bad.. It can preserve more grain and preserving grain can be be a good thing Especially with old movies. VC-1 and x264 work best with recently shot movies and animations who have minimum grain in their source. If you so much as have a bit of grain or lots of smoke and explosions with smokey clouds, H264 will make a hassle and macro-blocking will be very evident. That&#039;s my opinion anyway. I think That is why studios will smoothen and flatten the hell out of skintone and smoke before coding to mpeg-4 or VC1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did some testing in the past comparing MPEG-4 ASP and X264. Don&#039;t know how far x264 can be compared to h264 JVC, but MPEG-2 still isn&#039;t all that bad.. It can preserve more grain and preserving grain can be be a good thing Especially with old movies. VC-1 and x264 work best with recently shot movies and animations who have minimum grain in their source. If you so much as have a bit of grain or lots of smoke and explosions with smokey clouds, H264 will make a hassle and macro-blocking will be very evident. That&#039;s my opinion anyway. I think That is why studios will smoothen and flatten the hell out of skintone and smoke before coding to mpeg-4 or VC1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Pears</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/some-facts-about-hd-video-compression-codecs-used-in-blu-ray/comment-page-1#comment-4402</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Pears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/?p=647#comment-4402</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still sticking it out with MP4.  Perhaps in a few more months I&#039;ll upgrade to a blu-ray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m still sticking it out with MP4.  Perhaps in a few more months I&#039;ll upgrade to a blu-ray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
