<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Home Theater Calculator: Viewing Distance, Screen Size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carltonbale.com</link>
	<description>A personal take on tech and home theater</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:29:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Bale</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-4/#comment-3419</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Bale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-3419</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have any experience with any of those projectors. Higher contrast ratios are more important than resolution, 3-D, etc. I recommend you look at my &lt;a href=&quot;http://carltonbale.com/1080p-does-matter/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1080p Does Matter&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Home Theater Calculator&lt;/a&gt; articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any experience with any of those projectors. Higher contrast ratios are more important than resolution, 3-D, etc. I recommend you look at my <a href="http://carltonbale.com/1080p-does-matter/" rel="nofollow">1080p Does Matter</a> and <a href="http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/" rel="nofollow">Home Theater Calculator</a> articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Bale</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-4/#comment-3416</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Bale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-3416</guid>
		<description>Donovan, that ceiling height shouldn&#039;t be a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donovan, that ceiling height shouldn&#8217;t be a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donovan</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-4/#comment-3340</link>
		<dc:creator>Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-3340</guid>
		<description>I have 7&#039;4&quot; floor to ceiling height.  Can I have a theatre room witha a projector?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 7&#8217;4&#8243; floor to ceiling height.  Can I have a theatre room witha a projector?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reddy</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-4/#comment-3311</link>
		<dc:creator>reddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 01:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-3311</guid>
		<description>hello..the viewing distance is about 13ft from the screen.. so the main concern was with a screen size of 90&quot; with 13ft feet viewing distance wil dr be a huge noticeable diff in image quality as compared to 720p and 1080p projectors..?? and yes i will be using the projector duein the day time as well as nights..

and regarding the brightness the Optoma Gt750 is 3500 lumens with native resolution of 720p, 300:1 contrast ratio and 3D feature..prices at 499 quids...

the brightness of Optama HD600X is 2600 with native resolution of 720p, with 350:1 contrast ratio and 3D ready (i.e. its needs an optama 3D adapter which costs 170quids to make it project 3D content) and the projector itself costs 350 quids..

the broghtness of optoma hd230x is 1600 lumens with 1080p with 400:1 contrast ratio and no 3d..it is priced at 499quids..

so which is the one to go for..??

also everywr the optoma gt750 is described as a gaming projector so wil the video quality be good if not better than optoma hd600x..?? or wil it be lower than the hd600x..??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello..the viewing distance is about 13ft from the screen.. so the main concern was with a screen size of 90&#8243; with 13ft feet viewing distance wil dr be a huge noticeable diff in image quality as compared to 720p and 1080p projectors..?? and yes i will be using the projector duein the day time as well as nights..</p>
<p>and regarding the brightness the Optoma Gt750 is 3500 lumens with native resolution of 720p, 300:1 contrast ratio and 3D feature..prices at 499 quids&#8230;</p>
<p>the brightness of Optama HD600X is 2600 with native resolution of 720p, with 350:1 contrast ratio and 3D ready (i.e. its needs an optama 3D adapter which costs 170quids to make it project 3D content) and the projector itself costs 350 quids..</p>
<p>the broghtness of optoma hd230x is 1600 lumens with 1080p with 400:1 contrast ratio and no 3d..it is priced at 499quids..</p>
<p>so which is the one to go for..??</p>
<p>also everywr the optoma gt750 is described as a gaming projector so wil the video quality be good if not better than optoma hd600x..?? or wil it be lower than the hd600x..??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgbale</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-4/#comment-3308</link>
		<dc:creator>cgbale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 21:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-3308</guid>
		<description>reddy, you can refer to my &quot;1080p does matter&quot; article for resolution vs. screen size advise. Not sure what your viewing distance is, but I think you&#039;ll be fine with 720p. 

I suggest you look more at brightness than resolution or 3d capability if you are going to be watching during daylight hours. Ambient brightness will affect picture quality more than any of these other parameters. Go for a high gain screen, because they tend to be directional and resist light from the sides to some extent. If there is a window behind where you will be watching, better put some really thick shades on it.

I don&#039;t think 3D is that important. You may watch 2 movies a year on it. But it could be fun to occasionally play with, so get it if the cost difference is minimal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reddy, you can refer to my &#8220;1080p does matter&#8221; article for resolution vs. screen size advise. Not sure what your viewing distance is, but I think you&#8217;ll be fine with 720p. </p>
<p>I suggest you look more at brightness than resolution or 3d capability if you are going to be watching during daylight hours. Ambient brightness will affect picture quality more than any of these other parameters. Go for a high gain screen, because they tend to be directional and resist light from the sides to some extent. If there is a window behind where you will be watching, better put some really thick shades on it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think 3D is that important. You may watch 2 movies a year on it. But it could be fun to occasionally play with, so get it if the cost difference is minimal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reddy</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-4/#comment-3307</link>
		<dc:creator>reddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-3307</guid>
		<description>hello..i was plannin to buy a projector for my bedroom which is about 14ft in breadth and 16ft in length..placement of projector is fully flexible i.e. can be placed any wr..i am lookin to get a screen size of 90&quot;...my room is fairly bright that is it has white walls and ceiling..has a window with blinds but still some amount of light comes in..i was considering thre projector models..1. Optama HD230X (Full HD, no 3D) 2. Optama GT750 (720p, 3D), 3. Optama HD600X (720p, 3D ready). My main use wil be to watch tv, movies both dvd and blu-ray and also games ocassionally.
The questions are:
1. I know that u cant compare a 1080p model to 720p, but few articles and reviews i read said for a small screen size lik 90&quot; or so viewed from 13ft, both the 1080p and 720p will look very similar and wont hav much of a difference. Is that true..??? Or wil it hav a drastic difference in image quality..??
2. If 720p is fine and serve my purpose, ehich among the two is a better choice..??
3. Is it worth goin for 1080p model scrificing the 3D feature in other two or should i go for 720p model itself with an added advantage of 3D feature..??
4. Is the video quality in both Optoma GT750 and Optoma HD600X the same..??? if not den which is better as my main use is to watch tv (both std-def and hi-def)..???

Sorry for so many questions..Thank you..Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello..i was plannin to buy a projector for my bedroom which is about 14ft in breadth and 16ft in length..placement of projector is fully flexible i.e. can be placed any wr..i am lookin to get a screen size of 90&#8243;&#8230;my room is fairly bright that is it has white walls and ceiling..has a window with blinds but still some amount of light comes in..i was considering thre projector models..1. Optama HD230X (Full HD, no 3D) 2. Optama GT750 (720p, 3D), 3. Optama HD600X (720p, 3D ready). My main use wil be to watch tv, movies both dvd and blu-ray and also games ocassionally.<br />
The questions are:<br />
1. I know that u cant compare a 1080p model to 720p, but few articles and reviews i read said for a small screen size lik 90&#8243; or so viewed from 13ft, both the 1080p and 720p will look very similar and wont hav much of a difference. Is that true..??? Or wil it hav a drastic difference in image quality..??<br />
2. If 720p is fine and serve my purpose, ehich among the two is a better choice..??<br />
3. Is it worth goin for 1080p model scrificing the 3D feature in other two or should i go for 720p model itself with an added advantage of 3D feature..??<br />
4. Is the video quality in both Optoma GT750 and Optoma HD600X the same..??? if not den which is better as my main use is to watch tv (both std-def and hi-def)..???</p>
<p>Sorry for so many questions..Thank you..Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1080p Does Matter &#8211; Here&#8217;s When (Screen Size vs. Viewing Distance vs. Resolution) &#124; CarltonBale.com</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-4/#comment-3225</link>
		<dc:creator>1080p Does Matter &#8211; Here&#8217;s When (Screen Size vs. Viewing Distance vs. Resolution) &#124; CarltonBale.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 17:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-3225</guid>
		<description>[...] it is possible to estimate when the differences between resolutions will become apparent. Using the Home Theater Calculator spreadsheet as a base, I created a chart showing, for any given screen size, how close you need to sit to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it is possible to estimate when the differences between resolutions will become apparent. Using the Home Theater Calculator spreadsheet as a base, I created a chart showing, for any given screen size, how close you need to sit to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You&#8217;re not watching 1080p TV &#124; Tasel&#039;s Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-4/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>You&#8217;re not watching 1080p TV &#124; Tasel&#039;s Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-524</guid>
		<description>[...] you should be sitting?  There are many ways to figure this all out.  There is a very complicated THX method, which if you are designing a high-end theater you probably should figure out.  Different experts [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you should be sitting?  There are many ways to figure this all out.  There is a very complicated THX method, which if you are designing a high-end theater you probably should figure out.  Different experts [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-4/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-523</guid>
		<description>Wow - thanks for the detailed reply!  I now have an idea of some of the challenges I will face.  

I didn&#039;t even think about deadening the front wall (I have floor standing fronts and on-wall rear and sides, you appear to have all in-wall speakers) and the back wall is actually almost entirely windows.  I have it covered by thick blackout drapes, so hopefully they will have some deadening ability, since I really don&#039;t have any place to put panels.

Now, off to do some more research!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; thanks for the detailed reply!  I now have an idea of some of the challenges I will face.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t even think about deadening the front wall (I have floor standing fronts and on-wall rear and sides, you appear to have all in-wall speakers) and the back wall is actually almost entirely windows.  I have it covered by thick blackout drapes, so hopefully they will have some deadening ability, since I really don&#8217;t have any place to put panels.</p>
<p>Now, off to do some more research!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Bale</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-4/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Bale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-522</guid>
		<description>Hey Keith!  Copy everything and enjoy! 

The acoustic panels were a bunch of work. I should write a post on it but no promises...  Anyway, here are some things to consider.

The panels need to made of acoustic fiberglass to be effective. &quot;Acoustic&quot; ceiling tiles are too rigid, fiberglass insulation isn&#039;t dense enough. If you don&#039;t use the acoustic fiberglass panels, it won&#039;t attenuate the proper frequencies. Typically, these panels are available in 2&#039;x4&#039; panels that are about 3/4-inch thick.

To get the best acoustic performance, you&#039;ll want about 60-70% of your walls and ceiling covered. You don&#039;t want the room completely dead. You want some reflections scattered around the room. (Note that I didn&#039;t cover the ceiling at all and covered about 80% of the walls - a few of the panels don&#039;t have fiberglass in them. I thought panels on the ceiling would be ugly so I skipped it.)

You want the front of the room to be completely acoustically dead. I have 2 layers of fiberglass panels covering the entire front of the room and the front 3 feet of the side walls (beside the front speakers behind the speaker masks.

To get the best performance from the fiberglass panels, you want them to have a gap behind them between the fiberglass and the wall. 1/2- to 1-inch is ideal. This way, the sound that passes through the goes though the air gap behind the panel, hits the wall, reflects/disperses, and goes back toward the panel for more absorption. (Note that I didn&#039;t do this; it was too much of a pain I&#039;m not sure sure it adds that much of a benefit.)

The panels must be placed at &quot;primary reflection points&quot; for the 3 front speakers to get the best front sound stage imaging. (The surround speakers aren&#039;t as big of a concern because reflection/dispersion is more desirable with them.)  To find the primary reflection point: put your speakers in their desired location, sit in your primary seating position, have someone move a mirror along the wall.  When you see the speaker reflecting in the mirror, that&#039;s a primary reflection spot.  You&#039;ll want to do this for each of the front speakers. You will need to repeat this for both side walls.  Ideally, you should do this for the ceiling as well (I didn&#039;t, it&#039;s a pain.)  You may want to repeat this exercise for a few other seating positions as well.

You will need to install additional panels throughout the room.  The location can largely be based on aesthetes.  Just make sure you hit the primary reflection points. Having gaps between each panel will allow some dispersed reflection points around the room to brighten it up as little.   (My panels turned out to completely cover the wall with no gaps in between, I liked that look, so I went with it.)

You will want extra fiberglass in each corner to act as a bass trap.  Basically, put as much as  you can in the corners.  I put small panels at angles across the back corners and loose panels in the front corners behind the speaker masks.  Bigger would be better in my rear corners, but would also start to look weird/ugly, so I didn’t pursue ultimate performance over visual appeal.

I made the frames out of 3/4-inch MDF.  The frames are 2-inches wide.  I joined the corners using a biscuit cutter, biscuits, and glue.

The frames are covered in fabric from Guilford of Maine. Their fabric is available in a wide variety of colors and textures.  It’s thick and textured and hides imperfections  and uneven surfaces well, and works well acoustically.  I used a pneumatic stapler (and air compressor) to attach the fabric to the frames.  It requires way too many staples to use a manual stapler.  In general, electric staplers won’t hold up to the number of staples you’ll be putting though it. Electric will work fine for a few panels, but will likely die an early death. I read of someone going through 3 of them making panels. Pneumatic staplers are the way to go.

I attached the panels to the wall using industrial Velcro.  I put about 6 2-inch long pieces on each panel.  I didn’t trust the adhesive to hold the panels over time, so I put a couple of staples in each one (on the wall side and on the panel side both.)

Installing the panels was the single biggest sound improvement I had in my home theater, aside from adding subwoofers.  The front wall alone made a dramatic improvement.  It’s a lot of work, but it’s worth the effort.

I hope this helps – enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Keith!  Copy everything and enjoy! </p>
<p>The acoustic panels were a bunch of work. I should write a post on it but no promises&#8230;  Anyway, here are some things to consider.</p>
<p>The panels need to made of acoustic fiberglass to be effective. &#8220;Acoustic&#8221; ceiling tiles are too rigid, fiberglass insulation isn&#8217;t dense enough. If you don&#8217;t use the acoustic fiberglass panels, it won&#8217;t attenuate the proper frequencies. Typically, these panels are available in 2&#8242;x4&#8242; panels that are about 3/4-inch thick.</p>
<p>To get the best acoustic performance, you&#8217;ll want about 60-70% of your walls and ceiling covered. You don&#8217;t want the room completely dead. You want some reflections scattered around the room. (Note that I didn&#8217;t cover the ceiling at all and covered about 80% of the walls &#8211; a few of the panels don&#8217;t have fiberglass in them. I thought panels on the ceiling would be ugly so I skipped it.)</p>
<p>You want the front of the room to be completely acoustically dead. I have 2 layers of fiberglass panels covering the entire front of the room and the front 3 feet of the side walls (beside the front speakers behind the speaker masks.</p>
<p>To get the best performance from the fiberglass panels, you want them to have a gap behind them between the fiberglass and the wall. 1/2- to 1-inch is ideal. This way, the sound that passes through the goes though the air gap behind the panel, hits the wall, reflects/disperses, and goes back toward the panel for more absorption. (Note that I didn&#8217;t do this; it was too much of a pain I&#8217;m not sure sure it adds that much of a benefit.)</p>
<p>The panels must be placed at &#8220;primary reflection points&#8221; for the 3 front speakers to get the best front sound stage imaging. (The surround speakers aren&#8217;t as big of a concern because reflection/dispersion is more desirable with them.)  To find the primary reflection point: put your speakers in their desired location, sit in your primary seating position, have someone move a mirror along the wall.  When you see the speaker reflecting in the mirror, that&#8217;s a primary reflection spot.  You&#8217;ll want to do this for each of the front speakers. You will need to repeat this for both side walls.  Ideally, you should do this for the ceiling as well (I didn&#8217;t, it&#8217;s a pain.)  You may want to repeat this exercise for a few other seating positions as well.</p>
<p>You will need to install additional panels throughout the room.  The location can largely be based on aesthetes.  Just make sure you hit the primary reflection points. Having gaps between each panel will allow some dispersed reflection points around the room to brighten it up as little.   (My panels turned out to completely cover the wall with no gaps in between, I liked that look, so I went with it.)</p>
<p>You will want extra fiberglass in each corner to act as a bass trap.  Basically, put as much as  you can in the corners.  I put small panels at angles across the back corners and loose panels in the front corners behind the speaker masks.  Bigger would be better in my rear corners, but would also start to look weird/ugly, so I didn’t pursue ultimate performance over visual appeal.</p>
<p>I made the frames out of 3/4-inch MDF.  The frames are 2-inches wide.  I joined the corners using a biscuit cutter, biscuits, and glue.</p>
<p>The frames are covered in fabric from Guilford of Maine. Their fabric is available in a wide variety of colors and textures.  It’s thick and textured and hides imperfections  and uneven surfaces well, and works well acoustically.  I used a pneumatic stapler (and air compressor) to attach the fabric to the frames.  It requires way too many staples to use a manual stapler.  In general, electric staplers won’t hold up to the number of staples you’ll be putting though it. Electric will work fine for a few panels, but will likely die an early death. I read of someone going through 3 of them making panels. Pneumatic staplers are the way to go.</p>
<p>I attached the panels to the wall using industrial Velcro.  I put about 6 2-inch long pieces on each panel.  I didn’t trust the adhesive to hold the panels over time, so I put a couple of staples in each one (on the wall side and on the panel side both.)</p>
<p>Installing the panels was the single biggest sound improvement I had in my home theater, aside from adding subwoofers.  The front wall alone made a dramatic improvement.  It’s a lot of work, but it’s worth the effort.</p>
<p>I hope this helps – enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

