<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Home Theater Calculator: Viewing Distance, Screen Size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carltonbale.com</link>
	<description>My personal take on tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:26:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-21343</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-21343</guid>
		<description>How about adding an optimal TV/Screen height calculator using the eye height and distance from TV and suggested angle (10-20 deg) as parameters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about adding an optimal TV/Screen height calculator using the eye height and distance from TV and suggested angle (10-20 deg) as parameters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjali</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-16268</link>
		<dc:creator>anjali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-16268</guid>
		<description>Thank you for that spreadsheet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for that spreadsheet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Bale</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-15648</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Bale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-15648</guid>
		<description>Yes, projector zoom ratio does affect projector light output (as well as contrast ratio.) This variable is projector-dependent and cannot be calculated using a generic formula. Read reviews for your projector of interest, determine the brightness at a specific distance, and enter that brightness into the input field of the spreadsheet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, projector zoom ratio does affect projector light output (as well as contrast ratio.) This variable is projector-dependent and cannot be calculated using a generic formula. Read reviews for your projector of interest, determine the brightness at a specific distance, and enter that brightness into the input field of the spreadsheet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-15636</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-15636</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see a variable for projector distance form screen.  Wouldn&#039;t this distance affect the ft-luimen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t see a variable for projector distance form screen.  Wouldn&#039;t this distance affect the ft-luimen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best projector screen paint ! - AVForums.com</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-11962</link>
		<dc:creator>Best projector screen paint ! - AVForums.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-11962</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a gain of 1.    Hmm  I must be doing something wrong &#8211; I am using the Carlton Bale calculator CarltonBale.com » Home Theater Calculator: Viewing Distance, Screen Size (just because it seems to allow for a wider range of factors to be taken into account than the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Size HDTV is Right For My Room? - Design Inside</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-9196</link>
		<dc:creator>What Size HDTV is Right For My Room? - Design Inside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 20:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-9196</guid>
		<description>[...] to determine the appropriate size, viewing angle, etc. there is an excellent resource over here at this website where Carlton Bale (a Finance guru with a passion for tech) has come up with an excellent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to determine the appropriate size, viewing angle, etc. there is an excellent resource over here at this website where Carlton Bale (a Finance guru with a passion for tech) has come up with an excellent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interior Design Deals &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What Size HDTV is Right For My Room?</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-9184</link>
		<dc:creator>Interior Design Deals &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What Size HDTV is Right For My Room?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 15:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-9184</guid>
		<description>[...] to determine the appropriate size, viewing angle, etc. there is an excellent resource over here at this website where Carlton Bale (a Finance guru with a passion for tech) has come up with an excellent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to determine the appropriate size, viewing angle, etc. there is an excellent resource over here at this website where Carlton Bale (a Finance guru with a passion for tech) has come up with an excellent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-9053</link>
		<dc:creator>R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 03:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-9053</guid>
		<description>Hey 
Thanks for this awesome tool.

However i want to confirm something, if you could help me out here.

My room length is only 13 FT, and i plan to get a full hd projector along 140&quot; screen . Do you think this size will be suitable for this room, i just want the maxiumi size possible based on the 13FT length. Please advise

thanks in advance
R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey<br />
Thanks for this awesome tool.</p>
<p>However i want to confirm something, if you could help me out here.</p>
<p>My room length is only 13 FT, and i plan to get a full hd projector along 140&#034; screen . Do you think this size will be suitable for this room, i just want the maxiumi size possible based on the 13FT length. Please advise</p>
<p>thanks in advance<br />
R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-4439</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-4439</guid>
		<description>Carlton,

Thank you for your response.  That is what I thought I was doing &quot;over thinking&quot; this but I wanted to be sure.  

At present I have no option but to put the projector at 19&#039;11&quot; throw, mounted away from a back wall, fortunately I have a 10.5 ft ceiling.  

The height of the projector is mounted in such a way as the angle to the screen and the returning to the viewer&#039;s eye is nearly the same and after calibration and inputting the figures into your program gives me a calculated fl of 18-19.  Which as the room has little to no ambient light is perfectly satisfactory.

The PJ is installed in that manner.  And while it does not have the punch that mounting it at 14.5 feet does it appears to me, and I maybe just imagining (please tell me if I am) to really bring out the various shades of grey very well.  A good comparison would be this looks more like an Ansell Adams photo, versus a good advertising photo where punch is more important than shades of grey, such as Mr. Adam&#039;s photos.  The &quot;Pirates of the Caribbean 2 &quot; Blu-ray movie with mostly dark scenes looks great.  

As we really only watch DVD and Blu-ray movies I actually like less punch and more detail but I think it is a matter of personal taste.  Of course at this distance it is really not able to let one view TV in the daytime, unless it is cloudy, but we do not do that in this room.

Now the half-German genes in me (it must be exactly so) can sleep at night, fortunately the other half of the genes are mostly Russian and as usual they do not care a less.

So once again,

Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlton,</p>
<p>Thank you for your response.  That is what I thought I was doing &#034;over thinking&#034; this but I wanted to be sure.  </p>
<p>At present I have no option but to put the projector at 19&#039;11&#034; throw, mounted away from a back wall, fortunately I have a 10.5 ft ceiling.  </p>
<p>The height of the projector is mounted in such a way as the angle to the screen and the returning to the viewer&#039;s eye is nearly the same and after calibration and inputting the figures into your program gives me a calculated fl of 18-19.  Which as the room has little to no ambient light is perfectly satisfactory.</p>
<p>The PJ is installed in that manner.  And while it does not have the punch that mounting it at 14.5 feet does it appears to me, and I maybe just imagining (please tell me if I am) to really bring out the various shades of grey very well.  A good comparison would be this looks more like an Ansell Adams photo, versus a good advertising photo where punch is more important than shades of grey, such as Mr. Adam&#039;s photos.  The &#034;Pirates of the Caribbean 2 &#034; Blu-ray movie with mostly dark scenes looks great.  </p>
<p>As we really only watch DVD and Blu-ray movies I actually like less punch and more detail but I think it is a matter of personal taste.  Of course at this distance it is really not able to let one view TV in the daytime, unless it is cloudy, but we do not do that in this room.</p>
<p>Now the half-German genes in me (it must be exactly so) can sleep at night, fortunately the other half of the genes are mostly Russian and as usual they do not care a less.</p>
<p>So once again,</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Bale</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-4435</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Bale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 02:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-4435</guid>
		<description>Paul, I think you&#039;re over-thinking things. Make sure you more the projector in a way that integrates with your room. You won&#039;t notice any small performance differences between dead-center of the screen and the top edge of the screen. Figure out a range of projector locations that are acceptable to the aesthetics of the room, then within that boundary try to optimize image quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I think you&#039;re over-thinking things. Make sure you more the projector in a way that integrates with your room. You won&#039;t notice any small performance differences between dead-center of the screen and the top edge of the screen. Figure out a range of projector locations that are acceptable to the aesthetics of the room, then within that boundary try to optimize image quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-4431</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-4431</guid>
		<description>Carlton, 

One more question, in the Epson 6100 manual is written &quot;Ideally, keep the projector and place so its lens is centered between the top and bottom of the screen.  

In the manual, however, the maximum lens offset A (upper half of screen) if PJ is table/bookshelf mounted is, at 11.8 to 25.2 feet distance, 27&quot;, maximum offset for B (lower half of screen) is 86&quot;.  Does this mean that the strongest fL is centered 69% up on the screen, equation as follows (((1-(27/86))*100), or is this number irrelevant.  

If true would it affect the measured height at which one would calculate the light bounce in a higher gain screen say 1.24 and up?  Would the measure angle be taken from 69% up on the screen and not halfway up?

If it does affect where the measure is taken from would it be best to do as Epson suggests (center on the screen), or shelf mount it higher than center and offset down, or ceiling mount upside down?  The only issue I see if this percentage offset does affect the maximum fL the ceiling mount upside down angle would create a smaller luminosity angle to the viewer requiring a very long drop from the ceiling, if PJ is placed at around 21 feet, the drop would be 44&quot;, a longer drop if closer, assuming persons eye level at 37&quot;.

So what I am questioning is the luminosity center on the screen different than actual center if looking at the screen, and where on the screen is it best to take the angle measurements? Roll off percentage starts to take its toll at 21 feet.

I realize that I could be over thinking this but as you can see it would change the numbers as to where the angle is calculated from, but it is bugging me not knowing.

In my own case the 16.9, 1.24 gain Wilsonart Designer White homemade screen is a 110&quot; diagonal, the throw distance for the present will have to be 21&#039;, hope to change to 14.5 feet (under negotiation), and the screen sits 44&quot; off the floor.  I know 3-4&quot; too high.  We sit 15â€™6â€ť from the screen.  The arrangement cannot easily be changed because of being married to, as Rumpold of the Bailey said â€śShe who must be obeyedâ€ť.
Thank you for a very quick reply to my last question, after this I promise no more unless I do not understand the reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlton, </p>
<p>One more question, in the Epson 6100 manual is written &#034;Ideally, keep the projector and place so its lens is centered between the top and bottom of the screen.  </p>
<p>In the manual, however, the maximum lens offset A (upper half of screen) if PJ is table/bookshelf mounted is, at 11.8 to 25.2 feet distance, 27&#034;, maximum offset for B (lower half of screen) is 86&#034;.  Does this mean that the strongest fL is centered 69% up on the screen, equation as follows (((1-(27/86))*100), or is this number irrelevant.  </p>
<p>If true would it affect the measured height at which one would calculate the light bounce in a higher gain screen say 1.24 and up?  Would the measure angle be taken from 69% up on the screen and not halfway up?</p>
<p>If it does affect where the measure is taken from would it be best to do as Epson suggests (center on the screen), or shelf mount it higher than center and offset down, or ceiling mount upside down?  The only issue I see if this percentage offset does affect the maximum fL the ceiling mount upside down angle would create a smaller luminosity angle to the viewer requiring a very long drop from the ceiling, if PJ is placed at around 21 feet, the drop would be 44&#034;, a longer drop if closer, assuming persons eye level at 37&#034;.</p>
<p>So what I am questioning is the luminosity center on the screen different than actual center if looking at the screen, and where on the screen is it best to take the angle measurements? Roll off percentage starts to take its toll at 21 feet.</p>
<p>I realize that I could be over thinking this but as you can see it would change the numbers as to where the angle is calculated from, but it is bugging me not knowing.</p>
<p>In my own case the 16.9, 1.24 gain Wilsonart Designer White homemade screen is a 110&#034; diagonal, the throw distance for the present will have to be 21&#039;, hope to change to 14.5 feet (under negotiation), and the screen sits 44&#034; off the floor.  I know 3-4&#034; too high.  We sit 15â€™6â€ť from the screen.  The arrangement cannot easily be changed because of being married to, as Rumpold of the Bailey said â€śShe who must be obeyedâ€ť.<br />
Thank you for a very quick reply to my last question, after this I promise no more unless I do not understand the reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Bale</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-4430</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Bale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-4430</guid>
		<description>Paul: You are correct. The vertical angle between the viewers eyes up the center of the screen and the angle between the center of the screen up to the projector should be the same for maximum brightness.  The difference is more apparent with higher gain screens, which are more directional. But you are likely to get more brightness gain by zooming the lens so the projector is as close as possible to the screen; the trade-off is generally slightly reduced contrast ratio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul: You are correct. The vertical angle between the viewers eyes up the center of the screen and the angle between the center of the screen up to the projector should be the same for maximum brightness.  The difference is more apparent with higher gain screens, which are more directional. But you are likely to get more brightness gain by zooming the lens so the projector is as close as possible to the screen; the trade-off is generally slightly reduced contrast ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul ( A different one)</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-4428</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul ( A different one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-4428</guid>
		<description>Carlton, 

Having been using your program and it is great.

Question, does a program exist that gives one the optimum drop placement from the ceiling so as to achieve the highest fL at the viewer&#039;s eye.  Assuming that the distance of the viewer from the screen and the PJ are different.

Please correct me if I am wrong (most proably am geometry was never my strong point) but ideally should the viewer&#039;s angle and the PJ angle be the same?

Thank you for all your hard work on this program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlton, </p>
<p>Having been using your program and it is great.</p>
<p>Question, does a program exist that gives one the optimum drop placement from the ceiling so as to achieve the highest fL at the viewer&#039;s eye.  Assuming that the distance of the viewer from the screen and the PJ are different.</p>
<p>Please correct me if I am wrong (most proably am geometry was never my strong point) but ideally should the viewer&#039;s angle and the PJ angle be the same?</p>
<p>Thank you for all your hard work on this program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-4361</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-4361</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say thanks, your calculator is great
answered all of the questions I had</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thanks, your calculator is great<br />
answered all of the questions I had</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Bale</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-4351</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Bale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-4351</guid>
		<description>Vertical placement: Start with the center of the screen at eye-level and move it up as aesthetics and any second row viewing-over-the-heads-of-front row requires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vertical placement: Start with the center of the screen at eye-level and move it up as aesthetics and any second row viewing-over-the-heads-of-front row requires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Maier</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-4350</link>
		<dc:creator>John Maier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-4350</guid>
		<description>Carlton, do you calculate the recommended screen placement (vertical), as well?  Thanks so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlton, do you calculate the recommended screen placement (vertical), as well?  Thanks so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LProulx</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-4270</link>
		<dc:creator>LProulx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-4270</guid>
		<description>Excellent work - really useful... I want to place my Sony TV - 52 inches diagonally over a fireplace - the minimum distance from the floor to the bottom of the TV would be about 60 inches - to clear the mantle.

Having a room 13 wide by 15 feet depth - how do I calculate the maximum height of my tv over the fireplace? Thanks LP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent work &#8211; really useful&#8230; I want to place my Sony TV &#8211; 52 inches diagonally over a fireplace &#8211; the minimum distance from the floor to the bottom of the TV would be about 60 inches &#8211; to clear the mantle.</p>
<p>Having a room 13 wide by 15 feet depth &#8211; how do I calculate the maximum height of my tv over the fireplace? Thanks LP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c.j.h.potasse</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-4228</link>
		<dc:creator>c.j.h.potasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-4228</guid>
		<description>Ecellent work,however it is unclear to me,are you talking eye-screen distance or chair front-screen distance or any other distance?Might be my stupidity,butbpls clarify.Thanks C.J.H.Potasse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ecellent work,however it is unclear to me,are you talking eye-screen distance or chair front-screen distance or any other distance?Might be my stupidity,butbpls clarify.Thanks C.J.H.Potasse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattyD</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-4211</link>
		<dc:creator>MattyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-4211</guid>
		<description>I think what this formula needs is the ability to calculate optimal tv size based on viewing distance/seating distance, resolution, and the like...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what this formula needs is the ability to calculate optimal tv size based on viewing distance/seating distance, resolution, and the like&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Bale</title>
		<link>http://carltonbale.com/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/comment-page-2#comment-4149</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Bale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonbale.com/blog/home-theater/home-theater-calculator/#comment-4149</guid>
		<description>The middle of the screen should be near to eye level, or slight above eye level.  If you have 2 rows of seating, make sure the screen is high enough for the second row to see above the front.  The screen will probably look too low on the wall; building a stage above the top of the screen solves that problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The middle of the screen should be near to eye level, or slight above eye level.  If you have 2 rows of seating, make sure the screen is high enough for the second row to see above the front.  The screen will probably look too low on the wall; building a stage above the top of the screen solves that problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
